We are investigating the possibility to add this functionality for Microsoft models as well. However, I'm unable to provide a definite timeframe for this functionality to be implemented.
Once again: our Devart Entity model generates the code that is fully compatible with the default Microsoft one (actually, it duplicates it in most cases, but we have added some additional features).
Search found 2919 matches
- Thu 21 Jul 2011 08:52
- Forum: dotConnect for MySQL
- Topic: "Tiny As Boolean" doesn't work
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1962
- Thu 21 Jul 2011 07:44
- Forum: dotConnect for MySQL
- Topic: "Tiny As Boolean" doesn't work
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1962
Are you using the Microsoft ADO.NET Entity Data model (.edmx)?
We have added the Tiny As Boolean support only for Devart Entity models (.edml). The functionality of the Devart Entity models is almost identical to the Microsoft Entity models, but our models are edited in the more convenient designer - Entity Developer, which is integrated in Visual Studio. To add a Devart Entity model to your project, go to Add New Item...->Data->Devart Entity model.
We have added the Tiny As Boolean support only for Devart Entity models (.edml). The functionality of the Devart Entity models is almost identical to the Microsoft Entity models, but our models are edited in the more convenient designer - Entity Developer, which is integrated in Visual Studio. To add a Devart Entity model to your project, go to Add New Item...->Data->Devart Entity model.
- Wed 20 Jul 2011 14:52
- Forum: Entity Framework support
- Topic: Guid in Storage, but String in Conceptual
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1721
The new "raw guid as string" SSDL type will be added in the nearest build (this build will be released in a week or so).
This type is partially supported: Insert, Update, and Delete operations are supported. The Select queries with Where conditions containing this type like the or
are supported as well.
However, we cannot guarantee the correct handling of the LINQ Extension methods like or
This functionality is almost implemented, however, we have some questions regarding implementation details:
1. Is the default ('N') format "00000000000000000000000000000000" appropriate? Guid.ToString() uses the "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" ('D') format as the default one, but it is longer for 4 symbols.
2. Do you need the possibility to select the string representation format (i.e. select which of the 'N', 'D', 'B', 'P', 'X' formats to use for the string representation)?
3. What should be the empty string literal representation? Namely, in the query like the "" literal should be translated to null or to Guid.Empty("00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000")?
If you have any other propositions, please let us know.
This type is partially supported: Insert, Update, and Delete operations are supported. The Select queries with Where conditions containing this type like the
Code: Select all
context.RawTable.Where(rawTable => rawTable.RawColumn == "D3BC058453DC43CCB7C542D8345388FD")
Code: Select all
string value = "D3BC058453DC43CCB7C542D8345388FD";
context.RawTable.Where(rawTable => rawTable.RawColumn == value)
However, we cannot guarantee the correct handling of the LINQ Extension methods like
Code: Select all
context.RawTable.Where(rawTable => rawTable.RawColumn.Contains("DC43CCB7C542"))
Code: Select all
context.RawTable.Where(rawTable => rawTable.RawColumn.IndexOf("DC43CCB7C542") > 0)
1. Is the default ('N') format "00000000000000000000000000000000" appropriate? Guid.ToString() uses the "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" ('D') format as the default one, but it is longer for 4 symbols.
2. Do you need the possibility to select the string representation format (i.e. select which of the 'N', 'D', 'B', 'P', 'X' formats to use for the string representation)?
3. What should be the empty string literal representation? Namely, in the query like
Code: Select all
context.RawTable.Where(raw => raw.RawColumn == "")
If you have any other propositions, please let us know.
- Wed 20 Jul 2011 14:18
- Forum: dotConnect for Oracle
- Topic: Bug when renaming a parameter of a EF4 Method
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1326
- Wed 20 Jul 2011 14:14
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Identity Guid Properties
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2502
- Wed 20 Jul 2011 13:54
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: v 3.50 GUID regenerated each time
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2055
- Wed 20 Jul 2011 13:40
- Forum: Entity Framework support
- Topic: 'ORA-00928: missing SELECT keyword' saving identity-only tbl
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2595
- Tue 19 Jul 2011 08:15
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Entity Developer, Entity FW and Partitioned Tables/Indexes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2378
The CREATE DATABASE and Code First Fluent mapping does not support database-specific .functionality.
The only way of Code First usage I can recommend is to use the DbContext code generation template with the existing database.
The only way of Code First usage I can recommend is to use the DbContext code generation template with the existing database.
- Mon 18 Jul 2011 14:11
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Cannot access the .edps file as it is used by another proces
- Replies: 24
- Views: 8609
- Mon 18 Jul 2011 11:55
- Forum: dotConnect for PostgreSQL
- Topic: Entity Framework Code First and TransactionScope exception
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2734
You are correct in your assumption. However, there is a simple solution.
If you open the context connection explicitly, EF uses this connection instance for all DB operations during the entire context lifetime. So, add the following code after the context construction code:
If you open the context connection explicitly, EF uses this connection instance for all DB operations during the entire context lifetime. So, add the following code after the context construction code:
Code: Select all
(context as IObjectContextAdapter).ObjectContext.Connection.Open();
- Mon 18 Jul 2011 09:26
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: Entity Developer, Entity FW and Partitioned Tables/Indexes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2378
- Fri 15 Jul 2011 17:02
- Forum: dotConnect for Oracle
- Topic: Bug when renaming a parameter of a EF4 Method
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1326
- Fri 15 Jul 2011 16:56
- Forum: Entity Developer
- Topic: v 3.50 GUID regenerated each time
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2055
- Fri 15 Jul 2011 14:12
- Forum: dotConnect for PostgreSQL
- Topic: Possible Bug: Parameter Name '@' Convention
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1492
- Thu 14 Jul 2011 14:03
- Forum: dotConnect for Oracle
- Topic: materialized view issue for getting data via domain service
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1324
Please open the %Project Folder%\.Web\bin\Debug\.Web.dll assembly in any Resource Viewer (JetBrains dotPeek, for example), and verify that the paths to the .ssdl, .csdl, and .msl files are identical to the ones mentioned in web.config of the .Web application.
This error should not be associated with the materialized views.
This error should not be associated with the materialized views.